- Home >
- Boxing >
- Who Would Win? Manny Pacquiao Delivers Verdict on Floyd Mayweather Jr. vs Terence Crawford
Who Would Win? Manny Pacquiao Delivers Verdict on Floyd Mayweather Jr. vs Terence Crawford
Manny Pacquiao has broken his silence and picked a winner in the dream fight between Floyd Mayweather Jr. and Terence Crawford. His answer surprised everyone… and it comes down to one key tactical edge.
Pacquiao settles the debate: he picks a winner between Mayweather and Crawford
The boxing world has long debated one of the most fascinating fights that never happened: Floyd Mayweather Jr. vs Terence Crawford. Two undefeated champions, two brilliant styles, and one unanswered question… until now.
Manny Pacquiao, one of the most authoritative voices in the sport, stepped into the conversation—and didn’t hesitate. The Filipino legend, who faced Mayweather in 2015 in one of the most high-profile fights ever, shocked fans by siding with a fellow American… but not the one many expected.
According to comments reported by Inside the Ring, Pacquiao was clear: he believes Terence Crawford would defeat Floyd Mayweather Jr. if both fought in their prime.
The key factor: a technical edge that could change everything
This wasn’t just a casual opinion—Pacquiao backed up his pick with a detailed breakdown. And it all comes down to a technical factor that can define elite-level fights: stance.
“Crawford has the advantage as a southpaw,” Pacquiao explained. But he didn’t stop there. He emphasized that Crawford doesn’t just fight left-handed—he has mastered it.
Terence Crawford, known for his switch-hitting ability, has built his career on versatility. His capacity to change stances and disrupt opponents’ rhythm makes him one of the most complex fighters to solve inside the ring.
“He knows how to handle that advantage and maximize it against an orthodox fighter,” Pacquiao added.
In other words: it’s not just about being a southpaw—it’s about knowing exactly when and how to use it.
Two undefeated legends… but styles make fights
A hypothetical clash between Mayweather (50-0) and Crawford (42-0, 31 KOs) wouldn’t just be a battle of records—it would be a chess match between two elite boxing minds.
On one side, Mayweather, the master of defense, precision, and tempo control. On the other, Crawford, adaptable, explosive when needed, and equally sharp in ring IQ.
However, Pacquiao’s analysis highlights a crucial truth: styles make fights.
Even Mayweather himself has admitted in the past that unconventional fighters could trouble him. In various interviews, he has pointed to Emanuel Augustus as one of the toughest opponents of his career due to his unpredictable style.
That’s where Crawford could find his edge: changing angles, switching stances, and disrupting “Money’s” timing—something very few fighters ever managed.

The context that fuels the debate
Pacquiao’s comments come at a particularly interesting time. The Filipino and Mayweather are once again making headlines due to a potential showdown on September 19, which has been described in different ways—from a professional bout to an exhibition.
Many expected Pacquiao to side with his longtime rival—or at least avoid picking against him. Instead, he did the opposite.












